A key goal of our project is to produce research, published in peer-reviewed journals, that is accessible to those who need it. If you would like a copy of any of the following documents please contact us and quote the title.

Would you like us to send you a copy?: email us

FINAL Toolkit (Posted Feb 10, 2017; updated Feb 27, 2017)

Baxter J, (2017) Participation promotes acceptance Nature Energy, 2

Walker C, and Baxter J, (2017) Procedural justice in Canadian wind energy development: A comparison of community-based and technocratic siting processes Energy Research and Social Science, 29: 160-69

Walker C, and Baxter J, (2017) “It’s hard to say ‘I don’t want my community to benefit!’ ”: Wind energy siting and distributive justice in Canada Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 133: 358-365

Fast, S., Mabee,W., Baxter, J., Christidis, T., Driver, L., Hill, S.,McMurtry, J.J., & Tomkow, M. (2016) Lessons learned from Ontario wind energyndisputes, Nature Energy, DOI:n10.1038/NENERGY.2015.28

Walker C, Baxter J, Ouellette D (2015) Adding insult to injury: The development of psychosocial stress in Ontario wind turbine communities, Social Science and Medicine, 133: 358-365

Walker C, Baxter J, Mason, S, Luginaah I, Ouellette D (2014) Wind energyidevelopment and perceived real estate values in Ontario, Canada, AIMS Energy Journal, 2(4): 424-442

Songsore, E., & Buzzelli, M. (2014). Wind energy development in Ontario: a:process/product paradox. Local Environment, 1-24.

Songsore, E., & Buzzelli, M. (2014). Social responses to wind energyidevelopment in Ontario: The influence of health risk perceptions and associated concerns. Energy Policy, 69, 285-296.

Walker C, Baxter J, Ouellette D (2014) "Beyond rhetoric to understandingydeterminants of wind turbine support and conflict in two Ontario, Canadaycommunities" Environment and Planning A 46(3): 730–745

Baxter J, Morzaria R, Hirsch R. (2013) A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict, Energy Policy 61: 931–943